I fundamentally disagree with that – to me that just sounds like moralising along the lines of ‘it’s taking part that matters’, postmodernist paeans to endless diversity of opinions of equal validity, or emphasising the ‘learning process’ as being as important as the final conclusions.
It’s true the ‘learning process’ is important for developing people’s critical faculties and when you’re writing a college essay, for instance, what your actual conclusions are doesn’t really matter all that much – but in terms of political action, what’s more important is that the conclusions that come out of participation and learning are actually a useful guide to political action and don’t actively hamper it, like some of Wright’s theories do.
I would have thought that’s the fundamental difference between philosophy and praxis, interpreting the world and changing it!