Because Marxism, let alone Leninism will never be a tenable solution in America (thankfully IMO).
I would also argue that it is a failed and hopefully dead ideology meant for a group that no longer exists. To keep grasping at straws and saying “if the workers would only understand [insert text from Marxist revolutionary playbook]” is the epitome of dead end politics. It is as assanign as me saying “if the workers would all just join the union then we would have a strong union movement”. You might as well try to wish unicorns into existence as long as you’re just wishing for things. To deal with the issues specifically weighed to the UAW or even American manufacturing in general are a little more complicated the just saying it’s Obama’s fault for the bailout which cut wages.
Aside from the difference in title how is the troika really all that different from a revolutionary vanguard? Neither are accountable to the people and both claim to act in their best interest even when the contrary can be seen by anyone gifted with the common sense that the good lord bestows upon a garden vegetable. I don’t want a benevolent overlords, the whole point is that I don’t want an overlords at all, be they an aristocrat citing noblesse oblige, a banker citing investor confidence and the demands of the market or a commisar citing Lenin and Marx.
I certainly don’t need to read the works of dead men to understand that they’re pausing on my leg and telling me it’s raining.
